MtnVista Home Page ] Family Home Page ] Mountaineering Home Page ] Recent Updates ]

Up


Portfolio Problem #1

By Michael Gehlke

October 25, 2004

 

We are given:

“Bret Boone of the Seattle Mariners hits a baseball one night at an angle of 28° with an initial velocity of 126 feet per second.  He hits the ball 3.2 feet above the ground and sends it toward the part of the outfield where the fence is 15 feet high and 380 feet from home plate.”

And the following problems:

1.      Find the parametric equations that can be used to model Bret Boone’s hit.  Simplify your equations as much as possible.

2.      Draw a graph of the flight of the ball.  Indicate direction of travel.

3.      Determine analytically whether or not the ball will clear then fence.

4.      Determine analytically when the ball will hit the ground and how far away from home plate assuming that there were no obstacles.

5.      Fine the value of dx/dt .  Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

6.      Find the value of dy/dt . Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

7.      Determine analytically the maximum height using a derivative.

8.      Use derivatives to determine analytically the speed of the ball at t=0.5 and t=2.5 seconds.

9.      Find the value of d2x/dt2.  Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given problem.

10.  Find the value of d2y/dt2.  Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given problem.

11.  Explain how you can quantify the acceleration of the ball in this problem at t=0.5 and t=2.5 seconds.

12.  Is the ball speeding up or slowing down at these moments in time.  Justify your answer with mathematical evidence.

13.  In what ways is analyzing motion of parametric models similar to analyzing motion of simple horizontal and vertical models?  In what ways is it different?


Part One:

Find the parametric equations that can be used to model Bret Boone’s hit.  Simplify your equations as much as possible.

 

Information:

First, let us take a look at the base projectile equations we are given:

Where:

A is the initial velocity in feet per second, q is the launch angle, and B and D are the initial horizontal and vertical displacement (respectively) of the object.

 

Now, to take a look at the information we have.  We are given that the initial velocity (A) is 126 feet per second; that the launch angle (q) is 28°; and that the ball was hit 3.2 feet above the ground (D).

 

Assumptions: 

For this problem, we must assume that the ball is moving in two dimensions, and that it was hit directly over home plate.

 

Solution:

To solve this problem, we simply have to come up with the equations that will model the hit.  To do this, we must plug the information above into the equations given above, and then simplify as much as we can.

 

As we can see here,     

we simply need to

insert the values we

are given and

simplify to get

our solution.

 

 

As you can see from those, the equations that model the movement of the ball are:

    or   

                                                (If you solve for the sin/cos part using your calculator)

 


Part Two:

Draw a graph of the flight path of the ball.  Indicate the direction of travel.

 

Information:

The information needed to solve for this problem are the two equations used to model the motion that we found in Part One.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

Using our graphing calculator, we find that the graph of the functions looks like this:

 

 


Part Three:

Determine analytically whether or not the ball will clear the fence.

 

Information:

Our information for this section of the problem are the two displacement equations that we found in part one, that the fence is 380 feet from the start, and that the fence is 15 feet high at that point.

 

Assumptions:

We must assume that the ball will clear if the value is greater then 15 feet, since the problem never gave us the size of the ball.

 

Solution:

This problem must be solved in two steps, the first being to figure out the value of t for which the ball will be at the same distance as the fence from home plate, and the second being to determine whether or not the height of the ball at that value of t is greater or less then the threshold of 15 feet to clear the fence.

 


For the first part of this problem, we need to use the horizontal displacement function (x(t) to find the value of t for which the ball will be sufficiently close to the wall.

 

To do this, we will set the linear displacement function equal to 380 feet (the distance from where the ball was hit to the fence):

Now, we simply solve the problem, using our calculators for the numerical portion.

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see, the value that we obtained from this is in theory very close to the point at which the ball would be directly over the wall, though there is of course some inaccuracy due to the nature of the calculations and the fact that calculators express everything in decimals.

 

Now, to calculate the vertical displacement for this value of t, and then check to see if it will clear the fence.

 

To do this, we enter the value of t we just found into the vertically displacement equation we found in Part One.

 

 

As we can see from that equation, the ball will clear the fence by nearly 3.57885147 feet.

 



Part Four:

Determine analytically when the ball will hit the ground and how far away from home plate assuming that there were no obstacles.

 


Information:

All we need for this problem is the equations that we established in Part One, and what common sense tells us, that the ground is 0 elevation.

 

Assumptions: That the ground is equal to 0, that there are no obstacles the ball will strike on its path.

 

Solution:

To solve this problem, all we need to do is to set the vertical displacement function equal to 0, solve for t, and then enter the found value of t into the horizontal displacement function.

 

Using the vertical displacement function:

Now, having found the times at which the vertical distance equals to 0, we much decide which is the one to use.  This is not hard since we are looking for a time after the ball was hit, hence a positive time.

 

Now, we must enter this time into the horizontal displacement function to see the distance the ball has traveled in this time.

Therefore, the ball will hit the ground about 417.2390154 feet from home plate.


 Part Five:

Find the value of dx/dt . Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

 

Information:

We need the vertical displacement function found in Part One.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

This answer must be broken down into two parts.  The first is the taking of the actual derivative of the function.  The second is explaining the meaning of the derivative.

So for the first:

Now, for the second:

This derivative is important because it is the horizontal velocity of the function, and because it is one of the components needed to figure of the vector of the ball. It is also in this case a constant.

 

Part Six:

Find the value of dy/dt . Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

 

Information:

We need the vertical displacement function found in Part One.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

This answer must be broken down into two parts.  The first is the taking of the actual derivative of the function.  The second is explaining the meaning of the derivative.

So for the first:

Now, for the second:

This derivative is important because it is the vertical velocity of the function, because it is one of the components needed to figure of the vector of the ball, and because in this case it is the variable velocity.

 

Part Seven:

Determine analytically the maximum height [of the ball] using a derivative.

 

Information:

The information we need for this problem is the vertical displacement function and the derivative of it.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

To determine the maximum height of the ball, we must first locate the value for t at which the ball ceases to go upwards.  This can be found by setting the derivative of it, which tells us the instantaneous slope, to 0, since at that point, it will neither be going up or down, hence at the highest point of its arc.

So as we can see from this equation, the time at which the ball reaches its peak is about 1.848544278 seconds after it is hit.

 

We now need to enter this into our vertical displacement equation to see what the height of the ball was at this time.

As we can see from this, the height of the ball at its peak is about 57.87385519.

 


Part Eight:

Use derivatives to determine analytically the speed of the ball at t=0.5 and t=2.5 seconds.

 

Information:

For this problem, we need the derivatives found in Part 5 and Part 6, along with the information stated in this question.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

To determine the speed of the ball, we must take into account the speed of both vectors, and then combine them to find the speed of the vector the ball it on.  While I’m sure that there are many ways to do this, I have chosen to find the general equation and then put in the values of t we were given at the start of the problem.

 

First off, to find the general equation, we must look at Pythagorean theorem.  Now, we look at this and realize that A is our dx/dt function, and that B is our dy/dt function.  That would mean that C is the actual vector of the ball.

Now, we can solve for the general equation.

Now that we have the general equation, we can simply enter into our calculators the values of t that we were given.

Doing this, we find that:

At t=0.5, the speed is about 140.833579728 feet per second and;

At t=2.5, the speed is about 135.670408767 feet per second.

 


Part Nine:

Find the value of d2x/dt2.  Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

 

Information: 

The information we need for this problem is the derivative of the horizontal displacement function that we found in Part 5.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

This problem must be divided into two portions, the first being to take the derivative, and the second being to explain the significance.

For the first part:

This is very easily arrived at; being that constants drop out during derivation, hence the second derivative of the horizontal displacement function is 0.

 

Now, for the second part, why this derivative is important to the problem.  This derivative is important because it is the horizontal acceleration in this equation.  Because it is constant, and equal to 0, there is no forward acceleration.

 


Part Ten:

Find the value of d2y/dt2.  Explain the significance of this derivative in terms of the given context.

 

Information: 

The information we need for this problem is the derivative of the vertical displacement function that we found in Part 6.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

This problem must be divided into two portions, the first being to take the derivative, and the second being to explain the significance.

For the first part:

This is fairly easily arrived at because it requires only two steps, the first being to drop the constant, and the second to be subtraction 1 from the t exponent and then multiplying the coefficient by the original power.  In this case the original power was 1, so the t component simply dropped out of the equation.

 

Now, for the second part, why this derivative is important to the problem.  This derivative is important because it is the vertical acceleration in this equation.  In this case, it is the only acceleration, and it is responsible for all the changes in speed throughout the entire equation.

 

 


Part Eleven:

Explain how you can quantify the acceleration of the ball in this problem at t=0.5 and t=2.5 seconds.

 

Information: 

The information that we need for these two problems is the information found in the previous two problems, Part Nine and Part Ten.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

The solution to this problem is more analyzing data rather then solving and producing any new figures.

 

We can quantify the acceleration rather easily by simply looking at it.  Since there is no horizontal acceleration, thus all of the acceleration is in the vertical dimension.  We have already solved for this number and we have found it to be –32, or 32 feet per second per second in the downward direction.

 


Part Twelve:

Is the ball speeding up or slowing down at these moments in time [t=0.5 and t=2.5].  Justify your answer with mathematical evidence.

 

Information:

The information needed to solve this problem in the manner that I did is the general speed equation that I found in Part Eight.

 

Assumptions:

 

Solution:

The solution to this problem requires that we first define what it is that we are trying to find.  We are trying to find whether the ball is gaining speed or losing it.  The next task would be to determine the best way to do this.  I have decided that observing the rate of change of speed of the ball traveling along its vector was the best way to do this task.

 

Given that, the first step would be to derivate the general speed equation that we found in Part Eight. This will give us the general rate of change of speed equation for the ball in relation to its current vector.

Now the work comes down to entering values and interpreting their meanings.  For this, negative values indicate that the ball is slowing down, since it will be applying force against the current movement along the current vector.  Given that, positive values will indicate gaining speed, since it will be adding force to the current movement along the current vector.

 

Having established that,

at t=0.5 we find that the value is about –9.8052562725, hence it is slowing down, while

at t=2.5 we find that the value is about 4.91699453892, hence the ball is speeding up.

 


Part Thirteen:

In what ways is analyzing motion of parametric models similar to analyzing motion of simple horizontal and vertical models? In what ways is it different?

 

Information:

Only what we know about the subject matter.

 

Assumptions:

That we know something about the subject matter.

 

Solution:

Analyzing motion of parametric models is similar in the sense that it is still in a plane, and that you can manipulate a single part of the function in the same manner, to find say the acceleration in respect to one of the movements.

 

That however is really where the similarities end.  It is quite different in other respects because you have to keep in mind that the graph that you see on the screen is actually the result, not the relation between the variable and the output.  It is also different because you have to constantly keep in mind how the two kinds of movements are interacting with each other.